Posted by Allison as Breakups & Goodbyes, Mischief & Mayhem at 8:30 AM PDT
18/10/2006
Wow, in a recent Us Weekly post, Heather Mills is crucifying estranged husband Paul McCartney and she isn’t looking back.
In court documents filed by ex-model Mills, Heather is claiming that McCartney was physically & emotionally violet towards her, took drugs as well as forbade her to breastfeed their baby during the marriage.
Here’s what Us Weekly broke down for us regarding the abuse, check it out.
October 2002: McCartney loudly pointed out that Mills was in a bad mood, in front of other people. When they returned home McCartney and Mills began to argue about the McCartney’s behaviour. McCartney grabbed Mills by the neck and pushed her over a coffee table. He then went outside and, in his drunken state, fell down a hill, cutting his arm.
May 2003: The couple were in a hotel in Rome when McCartney behaved coldly towards Mills, who was pregnant and who was distressed by a derogatory newspaper article about her. An argument ensued in which McCartney became angry and pushed Mills into the bath. Mills suffered distress but was made to go to McCartney’s evening concert.
May 2003: Following the concert, in a fit of pique because Mills refused to go to the aftershow party, McCartney directed a female bodyguard to abandon Mills, leaving her exposed to hordes of fans. The respondent was forced to take a 30 minute walk back to the hotel because no taxi was available.
August 2003: In Long Island, Mills asked McCartney if he had been smoking marijuana. He became angry, grabbed her neck and started choking her.
October 2003: McCartney often told Mills when she was pregnant that he did not want her to breast-feed their child, making the comment “they are my breasts” and “I don’t want a mouthful of breast milk”.
November 2003: McCartney required Mills to defer an essential operation on her leg because it would have interfered with holiday plans.
December 2003: Mills had a broken pelvic plate McCartney insisted that she cook for him while she was on crutches, could barely move and was in agony.
Mid-November 2004: McCartney failed to protect Mills from adverse press reports despite being in a position to do so. Mills was warned that a forthcoming article about her was about to come out in The Sunday Times magazine and included the line: “The best thing that ever happened to Heather Mills McCartney was losing her leg” which was distressing.
As McCartney had been asked to participate in the half-time entertainment for the Superbowl on Fox TV owned by Rupert Murdoch (who also owns The Sunday Times), Mills asked McCartney to tell Rupert Murdoch that he would not confirm his participation in the Superbowl unless he agreed not to run the story. McCartney refused to assist in this way.
September/October 2005: McCartney called Mills an “ungrateful bitch” in front of their driver when she explained why an office he had provided was not right for her. Having refused to allow Mills to use his spare office on the floor beneath their apartment, which would have allowed for a creche in one part of the office, McCartney had insisted she use an office that was far too small and was 20 minutes walk away. When Mills went to view it, she was chased by paparazzi and was so demoralised by the experience she never used the office.
April 2006: Shortly after Mills’ revision amputation surgery she was forced to crawl on her hands and knees up aeroplane steps because they were not wide enough to take her wheelchair. McCartney had assured Mills he had taken care of her disability needs in connection with the trip.
April 2006: An argument occurred during which McCartney poured a bottle of red wine over Mills’ head and then threw what remained in his wine glass at her.
McCartney then reached to grab Mills’ wine glass, and broke the bowl of the glass from the stem. He then lunged at the Mills with the sharp stem of the glass, which cut and pierced the Mills’ arm just below the elbow causing her to bleed profusely. He proceeded to manhandle Mills, flinging her into her wheelchair and wheeling it outside, screaming at her to apologize for “winding him up”.
April 2006: Mills asked McCartney not to leave her alone with their daughter Beatrice at the Cabin (because it is isolated in a forest). She had just had surgery on her leg, was in a wheelchair, and was anxious about her ability to cope by herself. Notwithstanding this, he walked off. Mills then telephoned McCartney, and asked him to return. McCartney mocked her pleas, mimicking the voice of a nagging spouse, and refused to return.
April 2006: It is alleged that Mills found McCartney staggering, undressed him and ran the bath and helped him into it. She then phoned the McCartney’s psychiatrist for advice and was told not to attempt to move him, to get a duvet and two pillows, to empty the bath of water, cover him, and leave him there.
Mills thereupon dragged herself upstairs, on her hands and knees (she was unable to wear her prosthetic leg as the wound from surgery had not yet healed) and brought back down the pillows. She found that McCartney had vomited on himself. She rinsed him off, and got him out the bath. At that time Mills had a broken plate in her pelvis and she was in agony.
April 2006: On April 27 Mills knew McCartney would be too hungover to help her with Beatrice and due to her own incapacity as a result of an operation, she had to call the babysitter to help get Beatrice to nursery.
The following day McCartney went to London but said he would be back in time to help the put Beatrice to bed. He did not arrive back at her bedtime even though he knew Mills could not cope on her own. McCartney arrived home drunk and demanded dinner and called the respondent a nag.
That evening Mills realized the marriage had irretrievably broken down and left, crawling on her hands and knees while dragging her wheelchair, crutches and basic personal possessions to the car.
No date given: Mills asked McCartney if she could buy an antique bedpan to keep under the bed at night so she wouldn’t have to crawl to the bathroom when her prosthetic leg was not fitted. McCartney objected, saying it would be like being in “an old woman’s home.”
Jeez, that was a load of badness, I’m glad to see you made it through without a scratch. So, what do you think- is all this true, is Paul McCartney the biggest asshole of them all?
{Source}
Do you like this article? Submit it to Blogosphere News!
4 Responses to: Paul McCartney & Heather Mills Divorce Update: Paul is an Asshole
ruth
November 2nd, 2006 at 7:48 am
Heather Mills couldn’t tell the truth if her life depended on it. Poor Beatrice!
Bob Creveling
November 9th, 2006 at 1:25 pm
Wow!!! Seems a far cry from…”To lead a better life…I need my love to be ‘Here, There, and Everywhere…..” BUT! As to Paul being an asshole? I think in truth…some people are just not good for each other, and of course, this is seemingly a classic case…and I’m sure that ol’ Heather probably provoked a lot of it, and then again, how much is exaggerated, and again in the public life…things invariably get blown out of proportion. How many of us can say we never tied one on and puked??? How many who say “till death do we part” & “I do”, end up a few years down the road, trying to take the other party for everything they got? Throw things at each other, fight bitter battles over child custody and have feelings bordering on out & out loathing for the other party??? Seems in cases such as this the “love quotient ” obviously seems to transform itself into something more resembling hate, which is truly sad. My best wishes to both of them, and may justice prevail. I wish them, at best a return to civility and at least a spark of the human love feelings that essentially brought them together to settle the matter with grace of character, so that both they and the children can start to heal from what obviously seems to have been a mistake fostered by unrealistic expectations and compounded by the additional pressures of a billion dollar estate, probably the most famous person in 20th century showbiz and music, coupled with a person who, unlike Paul, who has adjusted to it, spent a lifetime where he is conditioned to it, probably had no idea what she was walking into coupled with Paul’s need to probably find a surrogate Linda. Of course, both needs could never hope to be met, and when of course they aren’t…one needs only to look to the divorce textbook 101…unreal expectations insure breakdown and marital failure…feelings become bitter, as needs aren’t met, accusations fly about and personalities clash…all in all, a simple mistake on the part of both. Funny how the same things effect the blue collar struggling middle class couple barely making it, when a marriage fails as it does the ultra rich, talented, & famous. Either way it’s a bummer. I’m sure that Paul is probably a bit of an asshole and she is a bit of a gold digger…both are obviously human beings, and in my book best wishes for a speedy return to a normal life, and moving on to finding somebody that is right for each of them.
Susanna
January 28th, 2007 at 8:42 pm
Nasty woman, nasty nasty nasty. How could the world view this woman anything but a gold digger. Married for 3 years and she gets $60M
If she can get up in the morning and face herself so be it but she is a tart who posed nude, has no morals, has no family commitment and uses every trick in the book to make money moeny from a hard working man of over 40 years in the business. Shame on you tart Heather
LADY LUCY
July 25th, 2007 at 9:39 pm
LADY MILLS ?????
NEVER LIKED HER
NEVER LIKED HER
NEVER LIKED HER
SIR PAUL WAKE UP!
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Subscribe to RSS | Get Mobile Feeds
Partners
Categories
Latest Entries
Blogs We Like
Friendlies
Blog Resources
Subscribe